Trade Secret Theft: MRI Firm Admits It Used Fake Documents in $24 Million Trade Secret Case

MRI Trade Secret Theft Reading like the plot of a legal thriller, an MRI firm admitted to creating phony documents in support of its successful claim for theft of trade secrets.

LBDS Holding Co.(LBDS) was awarded $24.4 million by a federal jury in Texas in March.  The jury found that ISOL Technology Inc. (ISOL) misappropriated LBDS’s trade secrets relating to magnetic resonance imaging of the heart.

The jury found that ISOL had breached its technology services and product supply agreement with LBDS and that it had engaged in unfair competition.

LBDS sued ISOL in 2011, alleging that ISOL was selling a cardiac MRI system using LBDS technology. LBDS initially sought more than $60 million in damages in connection with a missed opportunity to sell its systems in Korea.

However, in May LBDS’s attorneys asked a judge for permission to withdraw from the case after learning that their client had admitted to manufacturing evidence used at trial.  They were allowed to do so in June.

ISOL served the firm with a notice that it intended to seek sanctions against LBDS for perjury and falsifying evidence.

Lead counsel for ISOL said he had received an anonymous voicemail urging him to alert the FBI to the verdict against his client.

ISOL’s attorney then learned that LBDS made changes to an agreement with a customer in order to show that it lost more sales than it actually had, according to the motion.

LBDS employees also allegedly created a fake website with a name similar to the client’s and sent fake emails purportedly from the client “confirming” the client’s intention to order a number of LBDS MRI units.

LBDS employees similarly created “evidence” that a venture capitalist was interested in investing in the company.

When LBDS’s attorneys confronted their client’s principal about the charges, he admitted that they were “essentially correct.”

The law firm initially asked its client to admit its wrongdoing to the court. When ISOL failed to do so, the firm brought its motion to withdraw.

When admitting to the court that it had faked evidence, and asking for the court’s forgiveness, LBDS contended that the jury verdict should be upheld.

The company also claimed that it planned to tell the court about the phony documents — but that its lawyers did so first.

If you feel that you have been unfairly accused of trade secret theft, contact our office to arrange a free initial consultation.

Please Like us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter for the most current intellectual property news.


 

Leech Tishman’s Intellectual Property attorneys are dedicated to the protection and monetization of your ideas and innovations. Many of our registered patent attorneys have advanced degrees enabling them to truly understand the complex technical details of your idea. Several bring engineering expertise, others molecular biology, manufacturing and business acumen to your trademark, copyright, patent prosecution and litigation and trade secret issues, both domestic and international.

Our clients range from individual inventors, authors and owners of creative works to entrepreneurial enterprises, government entities, mid-sized corporations and Global 500 companies with operations throughout North and Central America, Europe, South Asia, the Far East and Australia.

We have serviced a vast array of industries including automotive, cosmetics, e-commerce, electronics, entertainment, fashion, food and beverage, furniture, internet, manufacturing, networks, optics, publishing, software, technology, toys, and wireless.

We are committed to providing you with strategic counseling and personal attention throughout the entire life cycle of your project.

We are proud of our longstanding relationships with local innovation communities and enjoy working with entrepreneurs and businesses who wish to protect their ideas and good names.

Please contact us today for a free consultation at (855) UR- IDEAS or (626) 796-4000.

 

Disclaimer: We fully comply with all laws related to attorney marketing and this posting is considered an advertisement.

Photo Attribution: “MRI-Philips” by Jan Ainali is used through license by CC BY 3.0.

 

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Trade Secret Theft: MRI Firm Admits It Used Fake Documents in $24 Million Trade Secret Case

Please let us know what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s